Why physicians will always lose the reimbursement game

Wednesday, July 15, 2009


Got another e-mail from Sermo's founder Daniel Palestrant, MD. This one was titled, "Why physicians will always lose the reimbursement game." If you're interested in seeing the contents of this letter, then you'll have to get on Sermo (which is currently only available for U.S. physicians).

If you've been following the news, you know that the House Democrats recently unveiled a massive health care reform plan. According to CNN, "House Democrats unveiled their revised version of health care reform Tuesday, offering a proposal that includes a government-funded health insurance option, requires both individuals and employers to participate, and taxes the wealthy to help cover costs... Democratic House leaders said the measure, titled "America's Affordable Health Choices Act," met the requirements set by President Obama for health care reform by lowering costs to consumers and businesses, letting people keep their current plan if desired, and preventing denial of coverage due to pre-existing medical conditions."

Specific provisions of the bill include:
-- A Health Insurance Exchange providing individuals and small business with choices for coverage, including a government-funded public option.

-- No more coverage exclusion for pre-existing conditions.

-- Affordability credits for low- and moderate-income individuals and families, available to those with incomes up to 400 percent of the federal poverty level, or $43,000 for individuals and $88,000 for a family of four.

-- Limits on annual out-of-pocket spending.

-- Expanded Medicaid coverage to individuals and families with incomes at or below 133 percent of the federal poverty level.

-- Required participation by individuals, with a penalty of 2.5 percent of adjusted gross income for non-compliance.

-- Requirement that businesses with payrolls exceeding $250,000 provide their employees with health coverage or contribute up to 8 percent of their payroll on their behalf.

-- A series of measures intended to reduce costs of Medicaid, Medicare and other existing systems.
So how will these changes impact physician reimbursement? If we're trying to cut costs in healthcare, then it seems only logical that we'll be cutting some costs in physician reimbursement (although this may impact certain specialties more than others). Will physicians choose to transition into non-clinical areas and leave clinical medicine? Read the CNN article here.

Comments

No response to “Why physicians will always lose the reimbursement game”
Post a Comment | Post Comments (Atom)

Post a Comment

About Dr. Joseph Kim

My Photo
Dr. Joseph Kim is the founder of MedicineandTechnology.com, an independent website owned and operated by Dr. Kim. He is also the President of MCM Education, a professional medical education and publishing company that develops continuing medical education (CME) activities in joint sponsorship with medical universities, hospitals, and medical associations.

Dr. Kim is a digital entrepreneur and technologist who has a passion for health information technology, mobile health, and social media. He frequently speaks at conferences about non-clinical careers for physicians, continuing medical education, mobile health technology, and social media in medicine. He is a regular contributor for the Physician Executive Journal, the official journal of the American College of Physician Executives.

Dr. Kim holds a bachelor of science in engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, a doctorate of medicine from the University of Arkansas College of Medicine, and a master of public health from the University of Massachusetts Amherst School of Public Health.
View my complete profile
Blog Widget by LinkWithin